The lion, king of the animals by many, but why? Why lion, by which criterion? It should be the most something, but it is not. Is it the fastest? No, it is not. Is it the best hunter? No, it is not. Is it the biggest? No. Is it the strongest? No, it is not. Does it contribute to human society on any way? No. Does it have some kind of authority over the other animals? No. Is it the most beautiful? No, it is not. This is debatable though, but by many the Bengal tiger is the most beautiful in this category.
So, how we will judge this? By Phreakolosophy the best way to measure a competence of an animal in order to be entitled as king of the animals is to coronate an animal based on its wholesomeness to humans.
Hence, dog would be in category number one, because they from some social reason probably has become member of many families around the globe.
Cat because of same reason.
Horse, because we can ride them and make a some money betting on horse races.
Elephant, because it can work really hard, and we can ride it, and it is really big.
Chicken, because it is a tasty bestseller, and because of eggs.
Turkey, because gathers a families together sometimes.
Lamb, because it is the author’s choice.
By Phreakolosophy the best approach to determine which animal should be the king is taste, but in this case we will agree whatever voters decide, so vote people.
Wisdom of the week:
“I have never tried a lion, until then a lamb is the king of the animals for me”.
“I have never tried a lion, until then a lamb is the king of the animals for me”.
Joke from far, far away
Stay free and confused,
Yours Phreakolosophy